Countries where authors publish in Modern Rheumatology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Rheumatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Rheumatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Rheumatology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Rheumatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Rheumatology.
About Modern Rheumatology
The 4.3k papers published in Modern Rheumatology in the last decades have received a total of 56.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Modern Rheumatology usually cover Rheumatology (2.1k papers), Hematology (490 papers), Immunology (573 papers), Nephrology (178 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (205 papers) specifically the topics of Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (989 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (651 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (416 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (325 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (213 papers), Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (206 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (189 papers) and Inflammasome and immune disorders (172 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Rheumatology are Nobuyuki Miyasaka, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Yoshiya Tanaka, Hisashi Yamanaka, Haruhiko Akiyama, Masayoshi Harigai, Shunsuke Mori, Norihiro Nishimoto, Tadashi Yasuda and Shigeki Momohara.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.