Nathan Reading

28 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Nathan Reading
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 494
  • Algebra and Number Theory 279
  • Geometry and Topology 438
  • Mathematical Physics 137
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 139
Replace William Duke with:
William Duke United States
Burak Kurt Türkiye
Mizan Rahman Canada
Laurence R. Taylor United States
Michel Goze France
Peter Swinnerton‐Dyer United Kingdom
Seog-Hoon Rim South Korea
Michael D. Hirschhorn Australia
Thomas C. Craven United States
Mircea Merca Romania
Nathan Reading relative to William Duke United States William Duke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
William Duke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Reading

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Reading's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Reading more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Reading

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Reading. The network helps show where Nathan Reading may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Reading, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Reading Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Reading links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009121
2
Cambrian Lattices
200471
3
200566
4 200563
5 200756
6 200445
7 200743
8 200938
9 200432
10 201024
11 200324
12 200224
13 201120
14 200814
15 200914
16 200413
17 202312
18 201211
19 20109
20 20159

About Nathan Reading

Nathan Reading is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (21 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (19 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (12 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (3 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (494 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (279 citations), Geometry and Topology (438 citations), Mathematical Physics (137 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (139 citations). Nathan Reading has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David E Speyer, Sergey Fomin, Beryl Oppenheim, N. Brenwald, Osamu Iyama, Hugh Thomas and Idun Reiten. Their work appears in journals such as The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, International Mathematics Research Notices, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact