Nathan Oates
Impact in
-
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 6
- Cancer-related gene regulation 1
- Genetics 6
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 4
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1
- Cleft Lip and Palate Research 1
- Co-authors
- Emma Whitelaw (4 shared papers)Joke van Vliet (3 shared papers)Roger Pamphlett (1 shared paper)Piroska E. Szabó (3 shared papers)Purnima Singh (3 shared papers)Nicholas G. Martin (2 shared papers)David L. Duffy (2 shared papers)Dorret I. Boomsma (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cell Reports (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)Epigenetics (1 paper)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (1 paper)PLoS Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nathan Oates
8 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Genetics 150
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 79
- Molecular Biology 262
- Biological Psychiatry 6
- Neurology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Oates
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Oates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Oates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Oates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Oates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Oates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Oates. The network helps show where Nathan Oates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Oates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 114 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 4 |
About Nathan Oates
Nathan Oates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology and Urology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (1 paper), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (150 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (79 citations), Molecular Biology (262 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Neurology (34 citations). Nathan Oates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Emma Whitelaw, Joke van Vliet, Roger Pamphlett, Piroska E. Szabó, Purnima Singh, Nicholas G. Martin, David L. Duffy, Dorret I. Boomsma, Megan Campbell and M G Coulthard. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Reports, Current Biology, Epigenetics, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and PLoS Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.