Gary Comstock

36 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Gary Comstock
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Small Animals 26
  • Religious studies 15
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 33
  • Plant Science 95
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 44
Replace Luís Cordeiro‐Rodrigues with:
Luís Cordeiro‐Rodrigues China
Jan Deckers United Kingdom
Evelyn B. Pluhar United States
Josh Milburn United Kingdom
Ben Mepham United Kingdom
Henk Verhoog Netherlands
Raphaël Larrère France
Robert Streiffer United States
Charlotte E. Blattner Switzerland
Peter Schaber Switzerland
Gary Comstock relative to Luís Cordeiro‐Rodrigues China Luís Cordeiro‐Rodrigues's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Luís Cordeiro‐Rodrigues · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gary Comstock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary Comstock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary Comstock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary Comstock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary Comstock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary Comstock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary Comstock. The network helps show where Gary Comstock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Gary Comstock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gary Comstock Line = papers co-authored together Gary Comstock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200147
2 199227
3 201819
4 201817
5 200017
6 199013
7 198812
8 198912
9 198710
10 20138
11 19868
12 20227
13 19927
14 20106
15
Herbicide Resistant Rice
20035
16
An alternative ethic for animals
19994
17 19954
18 19984
19 19943
20 19993

About Gary Comstock

Gary Comstock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 44 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (6 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (26 citations), Religious studies (15 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (33 citations), Plant Science (95 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations). Gary Comstock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven R. Radosevich, Claudio M. Ghersa, Jack Dekker, Sue Donaldson, Jeff Sebo, Kristin Andrews, Will Kymlicka, Letitia Meynell, Andrew Fenton and Nathan Nobis. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture and Human Values, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation, Neophilologus and Faith and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact