Julia Shearn

21 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Julia Shearn
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Safety Research 146
  • Clinical Psychology 328
  • Ophthalmology 60
  • Education 142
  • Demography 52
Replace Lúcia Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Williams with:
Lúcia Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Williams Brazil
Ari Ne’eman United States
Estelle Malcolm United Kingdom
Marilyn Price United States
Climent Giné Giné Spain
Beckie Whelton United Kingdom
Nicky Gregory United Kingdom
Chris Cadenhead United States
Alan Factor United States
Valerie Clark United States
Julia Shearn relative to Lúcia Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Williams Brazil Lúcia Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Lúcia Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shearn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shearn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shearn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shearn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shearn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shearn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shearn. The network helps show where Julia Shearn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Shearn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Shearn Line = papers co-authored together Julia Shearn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000154
2 199760
3 199656
4 201545
5 199738
6 199338
7 201235
8 201635
9 201922
10 200020
11 200018
12 201318
13 202018
14 199814
15 201811
16 20208
17 19997
18 20206
19 20216
20 20195

About Julia Shearn

Julia Shearn is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (2 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (146 citations), Clinical Psychology (328 citations), Ophthalmology (60 citations), Education (142 citations) and Demography (52 citations). Julia Shearn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Todd, David Felce, Stephen Beyer, Claire Nollett, Miles Stanford, Daniel J. Smıth, Tom H. Margrain, Catey Bunce, Mark T. Hegel and Rhiannon Tudor Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Disability & Society, British Journal of Learning Disabilities and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact