Natasha Simons

506 citations
17 papers · 315 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Natasha Simons

16 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Natasha Simons
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Information Systems and Management 121
  • Internal Medicine 29
  • Information Systems 157
  • Conservation 18
  • Management Science and Operations Research 65
Replace Paul Moody with:
Paul Moody United Kingdom
Natalie Harrower Ireland
Robin Champieux United States
Ali Anıl Sınacı Türkiye
Christophe Boudry France
Justin Doods Germany
Matthias Löbe Germany
Anthony Stell United Kingdom
A Subaveerapandiyan India
Hansi Zhang United States
Natasha Simons relative to Paul Moody United Kingdom Paul Moody's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Paul Moody · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Simons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Simons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Simons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Simons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Simons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Simons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Simons. The network helps show where Natasha Simons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Simons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Simons Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Simons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2014105
2 201944
3 202039
4 201522
5 201221
6 201819
7 201217
8 201310
9 20219
10
New Content in Digital Repositories: The changing research landscape
20138
11 20136
12 20184
13 20073
14 20203
15
Redefining 'the librarian' in the context of emerging eResearch services
20143
16
ECMs and Institutional Repositories: The Case for a Unified Enterprise Approach to Content Management
20132
17 20210

About Natasha Simons

Natasha Simons is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems and Management, Conservation and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 17 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (9 papers), Data Quality and Management (6 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper) and Web and Library Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (121 citations), Internal Medicine (29 citations), Information Systems (157 citations), Conservation (18 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (65 citations). Natasha Simons has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Richardson, Bernard Yan, Michael Gonzales, Richard Dowling, Peter Mitchell, Helena Cousijn, E. Presani, Patricia Feeney, Rebecca Grant and Iain Hrynaszkiewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Data Science Journal, D-Lib Magazine, Aphasiology, Program electronic library and information systems and Journal of Neuroradiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact