Program electronic library and information systems

14.5k citations
943 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Program electronic library and information systems

721 papers receiving 12.1k citations

Peers

Program electronic library and information systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.2k
  • Information Systems 7.1k
  • Information Systems and Management 1.3k
  • Artificial Intelligence 6.0k
  • Computer Science Applications 908
Replace D-Lib Magazine with:
D-Lib Magazine United States
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology United States
Library Hi Tech News United States
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology United States
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly United States
Library Review United Kingdom
Online Information Review United States
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science United Kingdom
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science United States
Library & Information Science Research United States
Program electronic library and information systems relative to D-Lib Magazine United States D-Lib Magazine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
D-Lib Magazine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Program electronic library and information systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Program electronic library and information systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Program electronic library and information systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Program electronic library and information systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Program electronic library and information systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Program electronic library and information systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Program electronic library and information systems.

About Program electronic library and information systems

The 943 papers published in Program electronic library and information systems in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Program electronic library and information systems usually cover Library and Information Sciences (146 papers), Conservation (94 papers), Information Systems (569 papers), Computer Science Applications (54 papers) and Medical Terminology (2 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (213 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (173 papers), Web and Library Services (128 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (109 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (93 papers), Library Science and Administration (69 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (55 papers) and Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Program electronic library and information systems are Martin Porter, Peter Willett, Matthew Porter, Khalid Mahmood, Sirje Virkus, Stephen M. Mutula, Eunil Park, Ki Joon Kim, Mireia Ribera and Miquel Térmens i Graells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact