Natascha Techen
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Papers in
-
- Identification and Quantification in Food 8
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 6
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Ikhlas A. Khan (21 shared papers)Iffat Parveen (12 shared papers)Zhiqiang Pan (3 shared papers)Suman Chandra (6 shared papers)Hemant Lata (4 shared papers)Mahmoud A. ElSohly (3 shared papers)Stefan Gafner (2 shared papers)Brian E. Scheffler (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Planta Medica (20 papers)Molecules (3 papers)Frontiers in Microbiology (1 paper)Journal of Chemical Ecology (1 paper)Biotechnology Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Natascha Techen
43 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Complementary and alternative medicine 185
- Plant Science 440
- Pharmacology 95
- Pharmacology 183
- Molecular Biology 626
Countries citing papers authored by Natascha Techen
This map shows the geographic impact of Natascha Techen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natascha Techen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natascha Techen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natascha Techen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natascha Techen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natascha Techen. The network helps show where Natascha Techen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natascha Techen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 243 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 136 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 15 |
About Natascha Techen
Natascha Techen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Food Science, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (10 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (6 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (4 papers) and Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (185 citations), Plant Science (440 citations), Pharmacology (95 citations), Pharmacology (183 citations) and Molecular Biology (626 citations). Natascha Techen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Ikhlas A. Khan, Iffat Parveen, Zhiqiang Pan, Suman Chandra, Hemant Lata, Mahmoud A. ElSohly, Stefan Gafner, Brian E. Scheffler, Susan J. Murch and Pang‐Chui Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as Planta Medica, Molecules, Frontiers in Microbiology, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Biotechnology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.