Natalie Strobel

59 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers

Natalie Strobel
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Rehabilitation 170
  • Health 65
  • Biochemistry 47
  • Physiology 170
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 46
Replace Antonia‐Leda Matalas with:
Antonia‐Leda Matalas Greece
J. Caroline Dekkers Netherlands
Morteza Nasiri Iran
Sareen S. Gropper United States
Jalila El Ati Tunisia
A. C. Utter United States
Fotini Tsofliou United Kingdom
Christopher R. D’Adamo United States
Irène Strychar Canada
Christine Rosenbloom United States
Natalie Strobel relative to Antonia‐Leda Matalas Greece Antonia‐Leda Matalas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Antonia‐Leda Matalas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Strobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Strobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Strobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Strobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Strobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Strobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Strobel. The network helps show where Natalie Strobel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Strobel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Strobel Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Strobel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010160
2 2010109
3 201656
4 202249
5 201744
6 201540
7 200736
8 200628
9 201927
10 201426
11 202222
12 201920
13 201920
14 201819
15 202218
16 202217
17 201416
18 201213
19 201712
20 201612

About Natalie Strobel

Natalie Strobel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Surgery, having authored 64 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (5 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (170 citations), Health (65 citations), Biochemistry (47 citations), Physiology (170 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (46 citations). Natalie Strobel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeff S. Coombes, Susan A. Marsh, Claire Adams, Jonathan M. Peake, Karen Edmond, Aya Matsumoto, Robert G. Fassett, Glenn D. Wadley, Eyal Gringart and Daniel McAullay. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Systematic Reviews, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMJ Open and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact