Natalie Ring

496 citations
14 papers · 351 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Microbiology top 10%
    • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
    • Genomics and Rare Diseases
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
    • Animal Genetics and Reproduction

Papers in

Natalie Ring

14 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Natalie Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Microbiology 32
  • Genetics 116
  • Small Animals 23
  • Molecular Biology 151
  • Aging 2
Replace Morihiro Tateno with:
Morihiro Tateno Japan
Emily L. Kaufman United States
Koshiro Miura Japan
Réjean Lefebvre Canada
Birte Zurek Germany
Mirco Junker United States
Kanako Kato Japan
Alena Kozlova United States
Youngmee Sul United States
Judit Bíró Hungary
Natalie Ring relative to Morihiro Tateno Japan Morihiro Tateno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Morihiro Tateno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ring. The network helps show where Natalie Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Ring Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017181
2 201853
3 201527
4 201820
5 201913
6 202311
7 202210
8 20169
9 20249
10 20208
11 20225
12 20243
13 20151
14 20261

About Natalie Ring

Natalie Ring is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (4 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (32 citations), Genetics (116 citations), Small Animals (23 citations), Molecular Biology (151 citations) and Aging (2 citations). Natalie Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Bagby, Andrew Preston, Miten Jain, Hugh E. Olsen, Iain MacArthur, J. Ross Fitzgerald, Gonzalo Yebra, Gavin K. Paterson, Tim Nuttall and Joana Alves. Their work appears in journals such as Microbial Genomics, Veterinary Dermatology, Nature Methods, Mammalian Genome and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact