Natalie Freeman

45 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

Natalie Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biological Psychiatry 44
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 201
  • Pharmacology 116
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 156
Replace Shoko Tsuchimine with:
Shoko Tsuchimine Japan
Gwyneth C.M. Zai Canada
Sajid Ali Shaikh Canada
Rudi Hwang Canada
Heather S. Ryan United States
Sarah Osborne United Kingdom
Yoshiteru Takekita Japan
Koichi Ohara Japan
M.A. Crocq France
Helge Neidt Germany
Natalie Freeman relative to Shoko Tsuchimine Japan Shoko Tsuchimine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Shoko Tsuchimine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Freeman. The network helps show where Natalie Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201672
2 201355
3 201154
4 201654
5 201053
6 201551
7 201342
8 201838
9 201532
10 201325
11 201224
12 201523
13 201522
14 201721
15 201519
16 201618
17 201418
18 201017
19 201816
20 201915

About Natalie Freeman

Natalie Freeman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (201 citations), Pharmacology (116 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (156 citations). Natalie Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James L. Kennedy, Arun Kumar Tiwari, Daniel Mueller, Clement C.H. Zai, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Jeffrey Alan Lieberman, Eva J. Brandl, Brian Levine, Rebecca M. Todd and Sajid Ali Shaikh. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Psychiatric Research, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact