Natalie Day

407 citations
16 papers · 261 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Day

13 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Natalie Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Environmental Chemistry 70
  • History and Philosophy of Science 19
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 82
  • Reproductive Medicine 23
  • Political Science and International Relations 63
Replace Carole Barthélémy with:
Carole Barthélémy France
Mzime Regina Ndebele‐Murisa Zimbabwe
Ángela Caro-Borrero Mexico
Sarah Laborde Australia
Olena Bilous Ukraine
Stéphane Ghiotti France
Susan Hanisch Germany
Najah A. Hussain Iraq
Dawit W. Mulatu Ethiopia
Xiaomin Xiang China
Natalie Day relative to Carole Barthélémy France Carole Barthélémy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Carole Barthélémy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Day. The network helps show where Natalie Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Day Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
New frontiers in science diplomacy: navigating the changing balance of power
201088
2 201840
3 201929
4 201721
5 202020
6 202119
7 202215
8 202015
9 20236
10 20232
11 20232
12 20212
13 20241
14 20251
15 20250
16
Expressionism and the unconfined female protagonist in three novels by Patrick White
20190

About Natalie Day

Natalie Day is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Pollution, having authored 16 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (7 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (5 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (4 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (3 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers) and Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (70 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (82 citations), Reproductive Medicine (23 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (63 citations). Natalie Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include James Wilsdon, Robert O. Hall, D. G. Chandler, Matthew D. Madsen, Jayne Belnap, Nichole N. Barger, Stephen E. Fick, Michael C. Duniway, Anita J. Antoninka and Sasha C. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Freshwater Science, Applied Soil Ecology, Water and Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact