Countries where authors publish in Freshwater Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Freshwater Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Freshwater Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freshwater Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Freshwater Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Freshwater Science.
About Freshwater Science
The 1.0k papers published in Freshwater Science in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Freshwater Science usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (552 papers), Ecology (817 papers), Environmental Chemistry (316 papers), Ecological Modeling (76 papers) and Water Science and Technology (148 papers) specifically the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (511 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (414 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (237 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (231 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (129 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (120 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (104 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Freshwater Science are Christian Griebler, Maria Avramov, Marco Cantonati, Krista A. Capps, Eric R. Larson, Fran Sheldon, Julian D. Olden, Robert O. Hall, C. G. E. van Noordwijk and Allison H. Roy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.