Natalie D’Abrew

820 citations
16 papers · 599 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Emergency and Acute Care Studies

Papers in

Natalie D’Abrew

16 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Natalie D’Abrew
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Clinical Psychology 239
  • Emergency Medicine 35
  • General Health Professions 75
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
  • Emergency Medical Services 16
Replace Ankie Tan Cheung with:
Ankie Tan Cheung Hong Kong
Laurie Long Kwan Ho Hong Kong
Kim Griswold United States
Nimi Idaikkadar United States
Nomi C. Levy‐Carrick United States
E. van der Ploeg Netherlands
Pavithra R. Bora United States
Lisa Zubkoff United States
Samiha Jarrah Jordan
Steven Cole United States
Natalie D’Abrew relative to Ankie Tan Cheung Hong Kong Ankie Tan Cheung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.5×
Ankie Tan Cheung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie D’Abrew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie D’Abrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie D’Abrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie D’Abrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie D’Abrew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie D’Abrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie D’Abrew. The network helps show where Natalie D’Abrew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Natalie D’Abrew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie D’Abrew Line = papers co-authored together Natalie D’Abrew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012154
2 2011116
3 201390
4 201641
5 201139
6 201428
7 201527
8 201426
9 201123
10 201619
11 201517
12 20087
13 20116
14 20174
15 20251
16 20161

About Natalie D’Abrew

Natalie D’Abrew is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (239 citations), Emergency Medicine (35 citations), General Health Professions (75 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (67 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (16 citations). Natalie D’Abrew has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Kate White, Louise O’Brien, Fiona Taylor, Donna Gillies, Carl Gray, Jessica Roydhouse, Fung Kuen Koo, Cannas Kwok, C.L. Barnett and Timothy Wand. Their work appears in journals such as Rural and Remote Health, Preventing Chronic Disease, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Holistic Nursing Practice and International Journal of Palliative Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact