Natalie Connell
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Innovations in Medical Education
Papers in
-
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Health Sciences Research and Education 1
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 3
- Co-authors
- Karl Lorenz (8 shared papers)Karleen F. Giannitrapani (8 shared papers)Hong-Nei Wong (2 shared papers)Elizabeth M. Yano (4 shared papers)Sara J. Singer (4 shared papers)Erin E. Krebs (1 shared paper)Carrie Cwiak (1 shared paper)Cati Brown‐Johnson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (2 papers)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2 papers)The Lancet Regional Health - Americas (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)JCO Global Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Connell
8 papers receiving 31 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 7
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 15
- Health 4
- Reproductive Medicine 4
- Pharmacology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Connell
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Connell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Connell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Connell. The network helps show where Natalie Connell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 0 |
About Natalie Connell
Natalie Connell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 31 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (7 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (15 citations), Health (4 citations), Reproductive Medicine (4 citations) and Pharmacology (7 citations). Natalie Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Karl Lorenz, Karleen F. Giannitrapani, Hong-Nei Wong, Elizabeth M. Yano, Sara J. Singer, Erin E. Krebs, Carrie Cwiak, Cati Brown‐Johnson, Jennifer F. Kawwass and Sushma Bhatnagar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, BMJ Open and JCO Global Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.