Natália Marques
Impact in
-
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
Papers in
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 10
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens 6
-
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 3
- Co-authors
- M. S. Pais (2 shared papers)Lia Ascensão (2 shared papers)Gustavo Nolasco (6 shared papers)Amílcar Duarte (11 shared papers)Gonçalo Silva (2 shared papers)Deborah M. Power (6 shared papers)Susana Dandlen (3 shared papers)Luís Eufrásio Farias Neto (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Plants (3 papers)European Journal of Plant Pathology (2 papers)Scientia Horticulturae (2 papers)Journal of Plant Physiology (1 paper)Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PortugalBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Natália Marques
21 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Horticulture 7
- Endocrinology 23
- Plant Science 159
- Insect Science 42
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 57
Countries citing papers authored by Natália Marques
This map shows the geographic impact of Natália Marques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natália Marques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natália Marques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natália Marques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natália Marques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natália Marques. The network helps show where Natália Marques may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natália Marques, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About Natália Marques
Natália Marques is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Food Science and Cell Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (10 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (2 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (7 citations), Endocrinology (23 citations), Plant Science (159 citations), Insect Science (42 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (57 citations). Natália Marques has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. S. Pais, Lia Ascensão, Gustavo Nolasco, Amílcar Duarte, Gonçalo Silva, Deborah M. Power, Susana Dandlen, Luís Eufrásio Farias Neto, Paulo Gouveia and José G. Barroso. Their work appears in journals such as Plants, European Journal of Plant Pathology, Scientia Horticulturae, Journal of Plant Physiology and Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.