Natália Becker

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Natália Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Genetics 447
  • Oncology 599
  • Cancer Research 311
  • Hematology 224
  • Developmental Neuroscience 48
Replace Erik J. Uhlmann with:
Erik J. Uhlmann United States
Jenny C. Taylor United Kingdom
Christof M. Kramm Germany
Nam Tran United States
Chloé B. Steen United States
Akash J. Patel United States
Juhyun Oh United States
Guoying Wang China
Maryam Fouladi United States
Ashley P. Ng Australia
Natália Becker relative to Erik J. Uhlmann United States Erik J. Uhlmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Erik J. Uhlmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natália Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natália Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natália Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natália Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natália Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natália Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natália Becker. The network helps show where Natália Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natália Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natália Becker Line = papers co-authored together Natália Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008471
2 2009150
3 2017131
4 201792
5 201388
6 200985
7 201274
8 200965
9 201763
10 201060
11 201159
12 201253
13 201745
14 201442
15 201142
16 201737
17 201735
18 201135
19 201634
20 200929

About Natália Becker

Natália Becker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Genetics, Hematology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (447 citations), Oncology (599 citations), Cancer Research (311 citations), Hematology (224 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (48 citations). Natália Becker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Lichter, Bernhard Radlwimmer, Axel Benner, Christel Herold‐Mende, Benito Campos, Rezvan Ahmadi, Andreas Unterberg, Christine Dictus, Burkhard Helmke and Felix Zeppernick. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cancer, Blood, Clinical Cancer Research, Cancer Research and Developmental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact