Nancy J. Vickers
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Early Modern Spanish Literature
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Papers in
- History 6
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Joseph A. Boone (1 shared paper)Peter Stallybrass (2 shared papers)Marjorie Garber (1 shared paper)Maureen Quilligan (2 shared papers)Jacqueline Murray (1 shared paper)Ann Rosalind Jones (1 shared paper)Margaret Ferguson (2 shared papers)Mary Beth Rose (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poetics Today (1 paper)PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1 paper)Shakespeare Quarterly (1 paper)MLN (1 paper)Critical Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nancy J. Vickers
9 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Classics 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 79
- History 53
- Music 10
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy J. Vickers
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy J. Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy J. Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy J. Vickers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy J. Vickers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy J. Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy J. Vickers. The network helps show where Nancy J. Vickers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nancy J. Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 108 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 13 | Introduction: Language machines | 2016 | 0 |
| 14 | 2009 | 0 |
About Nancy J. Vickers
Nancy J. Vickers is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (44 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (79 citations), History (53 citations), Music (10 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations). Nancy J. Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph A. Boone, Peter Stallybrass, Marjorie Garber, Maureen Quilligan, Jacqueline Murray, Ann Rosalind Jones, Margaret Ferguson and Mary Beth Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics Today, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Shakespeare Quarterly, MLN and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.