Juliet Fleming
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Medieval Literature and History
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Papers in
- Classics 3
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
- Byzantine Studies and History 1
-
- Public Spaces through Art 1
- Co-authors
- Danielle Clarke (1 shared paper)Louise Wilson (1 shared paper)Sonia Massai (1 shared paper)William H. Sherman (1 shared paper)Neil Rhodes (1 shared paper)Jason Scott‐Warren (1 shared paper)Peter Stallybrass (1 shared paper)Wendy Wall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Huntington Library Quarterly (2 papers)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (2 papers)Word & Image (1 paper)Res Anthropology and Aesthetics (1 paper)ELH (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Juliet Fleming
10 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Classics 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 39
- History 33
- Anthropology 21
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
Countries citing papers authored by Juliet Fleming
This map shows the geographic impact of Juliet Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliet Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliet Fleming more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juliet Fleming
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliet Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliet Fleming. The network helps show where Juliet Fleming may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Juliet Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 4 | Cultural Graphology: Writing after Derrida | 2016 | 11 |
| 5 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 8 | Wounded Walls: Graffiti, Grammatology, and the Age of Shakespeare | 2012 | 3 |
| 9 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 1 |
About Juliet Fleming
Juliet Fleming is a scholar working on Classics, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 11 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Philosophy and Literary Analysis (1 paper), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (1 paper), Public Spaces through Art (1 paper) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (22 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations), History (33 citations), Anthropology (21 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations). Juliet Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Danielle Clarke, Louise Wilson, Sonia Massai, William H. Sherman, Neil Rhodes, Jason Scott‐Warren, Peter Stallybrass, Wendy Wall and Helen Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Huntington Library Quarterly, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, Word & Image, Res Anthropology and Aesthetics and ELH.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.