Gordon Teskey

417 citations
23 papers · 158 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Gordon Teskey

14 papers receiving 48 citations

Peers

Gordon Teskey
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • Classics 18
  • History 35
  • Philosophy 30
  • Anthropology 24
Replace David Fairer with:
David Fairer United Kingdom
Joseph Wittreich United States
Donald H. Reiman United States
Derek Connon
Donald Maddox United States
Jane Tylus United States
Alfred Tennyson Tennyson
Juan Luis Vivès Kazakhstan
Alan F. Nagel United States
Morton D. Paley United States
Gordon Teskey relative to David Fairer United Kingdom David Fairer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Fairer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gordon Teskey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon Teskey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon Teskey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon Teskey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon Teskey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon Teskey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon Teskey. The network helps show where Gordon Teskey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Gordon Teskey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gordon Teskey Line = papers co-authored together Gordon Teskey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Allegory and violence
199650
2 196924
3 200620
4 200612
5 20158
6 19946
7 19936
8 20035
9 19864
10 20074
11 20104
12
Paradise lost : authoritative text, sources and backgrounds, criticism
20053
13 19863
14 19932
15 20192
16
Imagination and the Presence of Shakespeare in 'Paradise Lost' by Paul Stevens (review)
19871
17 20211
18 20131
19 19811
20 20091

About Gordon Teskey

Gordon Teskey is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Anthropology, History and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper), Violence, Religion, and Philosophy (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), Classics (18 citations), History (35 citations), Philosophy (30 citations) and Anthropology (24 citations). Gordon Teskey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Goldberg and John R. Milton. Their work appears in journals such as Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual, Representations, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, ELH and Modern Language Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact