Nancy D. Smith

1.2k citations
10 papers · 868 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy D. Smith

10 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Nancy D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Information Systems and Management 364
  • Communication 137
  • Gender Studies 144
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 98
  • Applied Psychology 57
Replace Donald C. Pelz with:
Donald C. Pelz United States
Einar Breivik Norway
Fanny Caranikas-Walker United States
Kenneth C. Schneider United States
Mohamed Amin Embi Malaysia
Kulraj Singh United States
David H. Furse United States
Daniel N. Braunstein United States
P. Richard Jeanneret United States
John P. Murry United States
Nancy D. Smith relative to Donald C. Pelz United States Donald C. Pelz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Donald C. Pelz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy D. Smith. The network helps show where Nancy D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nancy D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Nancy D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1987595
2 1988108
3
Communicating Innovations: Convincing Computer Phobics to Adopt Innovative Technologies
198660
4 198737
5 199326
6 198922
7 19708
8 19717
9 19884
10 19691

About Nancy D. Smith

Nancy D. Smith is a scholar working on Marketing, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (364 citations), Communication (137 citations), Gender Studies (144 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (98 citations) and Applied Psychology (57 citations). Nancy D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Millard F. Mann, Thomas Lewis Hill, Frank B. Alt, Thomas E. Hill, Terrence J. Keeney, Pawel Lewicki, Roy Omer Freedle and Hunter G. Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Handbook of statistics, Drug Information Journal, European Journal of Social Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact