Nadja Siebert

26 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers

Nadja Siebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 729
  • Neurology 102
  • Biological Psychiatry 2
  • Ophthalmology 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 17
Replace Marie Süße with:
Marie Süße Germany
Yu Yi M. Wong Netherlands
Sabine Niehaus Germany
Anne Ruiz France
Jingzi ZhangBao China
Rebekka Rust Germany
Jan Mendelt Tillema United States
Frédéric Pinna France
Setty M. Magaña United States
Eva‐Maria Wendel Austria
Nadja Siebert relative to Marie Süße Germany Marie Süße's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Marie Süße · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadja Siebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadja Siebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadja Siebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadja Siebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadja Siebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadja Siebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadja Siebert. The network helps show where Nadja Siebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadja Siebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadja Siebert Line = papers co-authored together Nadja Siebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020132
2 2021124
3 202170
4 202368
5 202062
6 202059
7 201943
8 202043
9 202127
10 201925
11 202125
12 202124
13 202022
14 201920
15 202020
16 202018
17 202013
18 202113
19 202011
20 202111

About Nadja Siebert

Nadja Siebert is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (24 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (729 citations), Neurology (102 citations), Biological Psychiatry (2 citations), Ophthalmology (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (17 citations). Nadja Siebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Friedemann Paul, Judith Bellmann–Strobl, Klemens Ruprecht, Susanna Asseyer, Alexander Ulrich Brandt, Sven Jarius, Michael Scheel, Joseph Kuchling, Frederike Cosima Oertel and Ankelien Solveig Duchow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroinflammation, Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Frontiers in Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact