Nadia Steiber

41 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Nadia Steiber
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Gender Studies 301
  • Demography 185
  • General Health Professions 313
  • Public Administration 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 526
Replace Matthias Pollmann‐Schult with:
Matthias Pollmann‐Schult Germany
Mikael Nordenmark Sweden
Heather Hofmeister Germany
Rebecca Glauber United States
Mareike Bünning Germany
Ellen Verbakel Netherlands
Meredith Kleykamp United States
Christopher R. Tamborini United States
Pamela Loprest United States
Magnus Nermo Sweden
Nadia Steiber relative to Matthias Pollmann‐Schult Germany Matthias Pollmann‐Schult's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Matthias Pollmann‐Schult · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Steiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Steiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Steiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Steiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Steiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Steiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Steiber. The network helps show where Nadia Steiber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Steiber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Steiber Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Steiber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012133
2 2016118
3 2009111
4 200984
5 200658
6 201552
7 202152
8 201050
9 201737
10 201437
11 201528
12 201527
13 200724
14 201024
15 201523
16 201923
17 202118
18 201415
19 201415
20 201214

About Nadia Steiber

Nadia Steiber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (11 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (8 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (8 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (8 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (301 citations), Demography (185 citations), General Health Professions (313 citations), Public Administration (42 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (526 citations). Nadia Steiber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Haas, Martina Dieckhoff, Caroline Berghammer, Ricardo Rodrigues, Andrea E. Schmidt, Claire Wallace, Martin Kohli, Stefani Scherer, Sergei Scherbov and Monika Mühlböck. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, PLoS ONE, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Socio-Economic Review and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact