Nadia Malik

640 citations
15 papers · 256 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Malik

14 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Nadia Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 94
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 61
  • Oncology 67
Replace Michael A. Dyer with:
Michael A. Dyer United States
Rick Hermsen Netherlands
Ronald Rivera United States
L. Láng United States
David M. Thomas United States
Annette Johansen Denmark
C. Wilson United States
Yujia Kong China
Elżbieta Szmida Poland
Uma Suryadevara United States
Nadia Malik relative to Michael A. Dyer United States Michael A. Dyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Michael A. Dyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Malik. The network helps show where Nadia Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Malik Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201194
2 201251
3 201141
4 201020
5 202212
6 202112
7 20208
8 20235
9 20224
10 20234
11 20192
12 20231
13 20231
14 20221
15 20230

About Nadia Malik

Nadia Malik is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Radiation and Cancer Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (94 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (61 citations) and Oncology (67 citations). Nadia Malik has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Tricklebank, Sophie Dix, Gary Gilmour, François Gastambide, Janice W. Smith, Kilian Salerno May, John F. Gibbs, Boris W. Kuvshinoff, Gregory E. Wilding and Graham Warren. Their work appears in journals such as Cancers, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Practical Radiation Oncology, Canadian Medical Association Journal and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact