Nada Khan

33 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Nada Khan's Hit Papers

Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review 2010 · 579 citations
5790+5+10Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Nada Khan
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Oncology 462
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 125
  • Family Practice 10
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 152
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 40
Replace Derek Kyte with:
Derek Kyte United Kingdom
John Cashy United States
Nancy C. Dolan United States
Karen Welch United Kingdom
Lisa Stirk United Kingdom
Bruce Weaver Canada
Jipan Xie United States
Lucia C. Petito United States
Deborah Fitzsimmons United Kingdom
Laura Sit United States
Nada Khan relative to Derek Kyte United Kingdom Derek Kyte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Derek Kyte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nada Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nada Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nada Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nada Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nada Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nada Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nada Khan. The network helps show where Nada Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nada Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nada Khan Line = papers co-authored together Nada Khan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2010579
2 2010344
3 2011146
4 2011121
5 201693
6 202066
7 201164
8 201162
9 201257
10 201152
11 201151
12 201150
13 201046
14 201545
15 201043
16 200731
17 201117
18 200911
19 201711
20 201011

About Nada Khan

Nada Khan is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (462 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (125 citations), Family Practice (10 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (152 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (40 citations). Nada Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Rose, Siân Harrison, Peter W. Rose, Stephen Harper, Rafael Perera, Eila Watson, Alison Ward, Julie Evans, L Carpenter and David Mant. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact