James Thomas

434 papers receiving 29.4k citations

James Thomas's Hit Papers

Cyberbullying and Children and Young People's Mental Health: A Systematic Map of Systematic Reviews 2020 · 186 citations
1860+4+8Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

James Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • General Health Professions 4.7k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.3k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.4k
  • Health Informatics 255
  • Applied Psychology 715
Replace Doug Altman with:
Doug Altman United Kingdom
P.J. Devereaux Canada
Jos Kleijnen United Kingdom
Cynthia D. Mulrow United States
Henrica C. W. de Vet Netherlands
Jonathan A C Sterne United Kingdom
L.M. Bouter Netherlands
A. Liberati Italy
Andrew Booth United Kingdom
Lesley Stewart United Kingdom
James Thomas relative to Doug Altman United Kingdom Doug Altman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Doug Altman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Thomas. The network helps show where James Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Thomas Line = papers co-authored together James Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 469 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Hit paper breakdown →
20086258
2
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
Hit paper breakdown →
20202518
3
Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
Hit paper breakdown →
20091535
4
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
Hit paper breakdown →
2014937
5
The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health
Hit paper breakdown →
2017819
6
Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children and Adolescents Compared With Adults
Hit paper breakdown →
2020534
7
Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
Hit paper breakdown →
2015457
8 2004394
9
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy
Hit paper breakdown →
2017372
10
The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2015366
11
Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
Hit paper breakdown →
2014357
12
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings
Hit paper breakdown →
2017356
13
The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report
2001343
14
Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2013335
15 2015304
16
Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide
Hit paper breakdown →
2018298
17 2005279
18
Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
Hit paper breakdown →
2017261
19
School-based interventions to prevent anxiety and depression in children and young people: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2019223
20 2017218

About James Thomas

James Thomas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 469 papers that have together received 30.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (38 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (37 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (17 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (17 papers), Community Health and Development (15 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (4.7k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.3k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.4k citations), Health Informatics (255 citations) and Applied Psychology (715 citations). James Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Angela Harden, Elaine Barnett-Page, Alison O’Mara-Eves, Josephine Kavanagh, Sandy Oliver, Ginny Brunton, Sophia Ananiadou, Joanne E. McKenzie, Kathryn Oliver and Theo Lorenc. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Systematic Reviews, Research Synthesis Methods, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact