Na Chen

704 citations
37 papers · 517 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Na Chen

33 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Na Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Immunology 145
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 90
  • Genetics 46
  • Cancer Research 62
Replace Joana R. Costa with:
Joana R. Costa United Kingdom
Hala Elnakat Thomas United States
Juan Gu United States
Xiaoping He United States
Adelyne Chan United Kingdom
Andy Hsu Australia
Changwen Jing China
Eider Egilegor Spain
Na Chen relative to Joana R. Costa United Kingdom Joana R. Costa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Joana R. Costa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Chen. The network helps show where Na Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Chen Line = papers co-authored together Na Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201692
2 202064
3 202051
4 201829
5 201229
6 202226
7
Overexpression of IL-9 induced by STAT6 activation promotes the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
201424
8
Role of high expression of IL-9 in prognosis of CLL.
201424
9 201523
10 201520
11 201319
12 201816
13 201515
14 202111
15 20198
16 20227
17 20137
18 20226
19 20206
20 20156

About Na Chen

Na Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Immunology and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (8 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (4 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (3 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations), Immunology (145 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (90 citations), Genetics (46 citations) and Cancer Research (62 citations). Na Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Xin Wang, Kang Lu, Xiao Lv, Peipei Li, Xiangxiang Zhou, Xiaosheng Fang, Wei Lv, Lili Feng, Juan Yang and Ya Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Cancer Letters, Oncology Reports and Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact