N. Stroh

827 citations
28 papers · 653 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

N. Stroh

26 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

N. Stroh
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Catalysis 175
  • Water Science and Technology 173
  • Inorganic Chemistry 94
  • Mechanical Engineering 208
  • Materials Chemistry 246
Replace M.A.G. Vorstman with:
M.A.G. Vorstman Netherlands
Sigrid Benfer Germany
K. Haas‐Santo Germany
Pyung Soo Lee South Korea
Youichi Negishi Japan
A. Tabe-Mohammadi Canada
P. Gronchi Italy
Ji Jiang China
N. Stroh relative to M.A.G. Vorstman Netherlands M.A.G. Vorstman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M.A.G. Vorstman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Stroh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Stroh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Stroh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Stroh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Stroh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Stroh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Stroh. The network helps show where N. Stroh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Stroh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Stroh Line = papers co-authored together N. Stroh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200183
2 199870
3 200361
4 198257
5 200054
6 200350
7 198844
8 199040
9 199535
10 200122
11 200321
12 198621
13 199416
14 199512
15 198612
16 199211
17 19979
18 19978
19 19996
20 19925

About N. Stroh

N. Stroh is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Catalysis and Materials Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (6 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (4 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (3 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (3 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (2 papers), Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (2 papers) and Copper Interconnects and Reliability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (175 citations), Water Science and Technology (173 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (94 citations), Mechanical Engineering (208 citations) and Materials Chemistry (246 citations). N. Stroh has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. Chmiel, H. Bauser, H. Brunner, Shishan Sheng, Xiulian Pan, Gaoming Xiong, Weishen Yang, Herwig Brunner, Xiaochun Xu and Jie Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Membrane Science, Chemical Communications, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Catalysis Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact