Colin Cryer

102 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Colin Cryer
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Numerical Analysis 427
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 192
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 446
  • Emergency Medicine 212
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 156
Replace C. William Schwab with:
C. William Schwab United States
Alastair A. Spence United Kingdom
Jonathan T. Carter United States
T. Downs United States
S. H. Chang United States
Robert W. Lewis Jr. United States
Alla E Sikorskii United States
Timothy C. Y. Chan Canada
Robert C. Ward United States
Suojin Wang United States
Colin Cryer relative to C. William Schwab United States C. William Schwab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.7×
C. William Schwab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Cryer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Cryer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Cryer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Cryer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Cryer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Cryer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Cryer. The network helps show where Colin Cryer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colin Cryer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Cryer Line = papers co-authored together Colin Cryer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972283
2 2002168
3 1996120
4 2004116
5 198395
6 200688
7 200079
8 200276
9 199772
10 197671
11 199368
12 197362
13 201162
14 200560
15 200659
16 200057
17 197156
18 201454
19 197253
20 200649

About Colin Cryer

Colin Cryer is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Emergency Medicine, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 105 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (13 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (7 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (7 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (6 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (427 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (192 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (446 citations), Emergency Medicine (212 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (156 citations). Colin Cryer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leon Lapidus, John H. Seinfeld, John Desmond Langley, Paul Scuffham, Rosa Legood, Paul P. Lunkenheimer, Achi Brandt, Leone Ridsdale, Peter F. Niederer and Robert Henry Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Injury Prevention, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Mathematics of Computation, Numerische Mathematik and Linear Algebra and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact