M.T. Hilgers

17 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

M.T. Hilgers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Molecular Medicine 153
  • Infectious Diseases 442
  • Clinical Biochemistry 135
  • Molecular Biology 681
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 16
Replace M. Clelia Ganoza with:
M. Clelia Ganoza Canada
Jane A. Thanassi United States
Steven Swaney United States
Anna M. Upton United States
Umashankar Vetrivel India
Eung‐Chil Choi South Korea
Kenneth Duncan United Kingdom
Magdalena Zalacaín United States
Klaus Gebhardt Germany
R. J. McRipley United States
M.T. Hilgers relative to M. Clelia Ganoza Canada M. Clelia Ganoza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
M. Clelia Ganoza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.T. Hilgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.T. Hilgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.T. Hilgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.T. Hilgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.T. Hilgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.T. Hilgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.T. Hilgers. The network helps show where M.T. Hilgers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.T. Hilgers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.T. Hilgers Line = papers co-authored together M.T. Hilgers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2009177
2 2010131
3 2004121
4 2009113
5 200197
6 200494
7 201071
8 200367
9 201466
10 200360
11 201150
12 201343
13 200326
14 202025
15 200816
16 200815
17 200714

About M.T. Hilgers

M.T. Hilgers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Molecular Medicine and Organic Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (2 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (2 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (153 citations), Infectious Diseases (442 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (135 citations), Molecular Biology (681 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations). M.T. Hilgers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karen Joy Shaw, Jeffrey B. Locke, Martha Ludwig, G. C. Kedar, David J. Hosfield, Jeffrey L. Stein, Gracia Morales, Juan J. Picazo, John M. Finn and D.P. Huddler. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact