Moti Frank

1.5k citations
47 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Moti Frank

45 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Moti Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Media Technology 294
  • Architecture 42
  • Management Science and Operations Research 317
  • Education 480
  • Computer Science Applications 84
Replace William Swart with:
William Swart United States
Jack R. Lohmann United States
Keith Willey Australia
Doris R. Brodeur United States
Kristina Edström Sweden
Peter Charles Woods Malaysia
Marcela Hernández-de-Menéndez Mexico
Edmundo Tovar Spain
Karen M. Bursic United States
Günter Ropohl Germany
Moti Frank relative to William Swart United States William Swart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William Swart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moti Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moti Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moti Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moti Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moti Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moti Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moti Frank. The network helps show where Moti Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Moti Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moti Frank Line = papers co-authored together Moti Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003305
2 2004145
3 200089
4 200666
5 200253
6 200950
7 201242
8 201838
9 200532
10 200024
11 200624
12 200123
13 201122
14 201221
15 199921
16 200219
17 200818
18
Implications of Presenting Pre-University Courses Using the Blended e-Learning Approach
200216
19 200516
20 200715

About Moti Frank

Moti Frank is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Media Technology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (29 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (20 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (9 papers), Design Education and Practice (8 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (294 citations), Architecture (42 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (317 citations), Education (480 citations) and Computer Science Applications (84 citations). Moti Frank has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Elata, Ilana Lavy, Shlomo Waks, Keith Humphreys, Joseph Eli Kasser, Arik Sadeh, Gila Kurtz, Yang Zhao, Derek K. Hitchins and Ofer Zwikael. Their work appears in journals such as Systems Engineering, Project Management Journal, Journal of Technology Education, IEEE Engineering Management Review and International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact