Mona Simion
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 54
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 53
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
-
- Free Will and Agency 21
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 7
- Co-authors
- Christoph Kelp (19 shared papers)J. Adam Carter (3 shared papers)Emma C. Gordon (1 shared paper)Cameron Boult (2 shared papers)Glen Pettigrove (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (10 papers)Inquiry (4 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Philosophical Issues (3 papers)Episteme (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumNorway
In The Last Decade
Mona Simion
57 papers receiving 648 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Philosophy 538
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
- Health Informatics 18
- Cognitive Neuroscience 247
- History and Philosophy of Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Mona Simion
This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Simion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Simion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Simion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Simion
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Simion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Simion. The network helps show where Mona Simion may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mona Simion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 11 |
About Mona Simion
Mona Simion is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 61 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (53 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Free Will and Agency (21 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (13 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (538 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (259 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (247 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (62 citations). Mona Simion has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Kelp, J. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon, Cameron Boult and Glen Pettigrove. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Inquiry, Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Issues and Episteme.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.