Mona Khan
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 14
-
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques 9
- Co-authors
- Peter Mombaerts (19 shared papers)Evelien Vaes (4 shared papers)Ximena Ibarra-Soria (3 shared papers)Darren W. Logan (3 shared papers)Luís R. Saraiva (2 shared papers)John C. Marioni (2 shared papers)Masayo Omura (2 shared papers)Antonio Scialdone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- genesis (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)eNeuro (1 paper)Cell (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mona Khan
23 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Sensory Systems 481
- Nutrition and Dietetics 357
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 362
- Developmental Neuroscience 12
- Neurology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Mona Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Khan. The network helps show where Mona Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mona Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 3 |
About Mona Khan
Mona Khan is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 703 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (14 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (481 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (357 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (362 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (12 citations) and Neurology (22 citations). Mona Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Mombaerts, Evelien Vaes, Ximena Ibarra-Soria, Darren W. Logan, Luís R. Saraiva, John C. Marioni, Masayo Omura, Antonio Scialdone, Andreas Walz and Paul Feinstein. Their work appears in journals such as genesis, Scientific Reports, Nature Communications, eNeuro and Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.