Mohamed Eisa

37 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Mohamed Eisa
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gastroenterology 99
  • Management Science and Operations Research 35
  • Media Technology 21
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 50
  • Speech and Hearing 13
Replace Colin White with:
Colin White United States
Manjeet Singh India
Michael D. Vasilakakis Greece
Heidi Gregersen Denmark
Abdul Raouf Khan Saudi Arabia
Jianwu Yang China
Ahmed Abdullah Alqarni Saudi Arabia
Ruikai Zhang China
Georg Wimmer Austria
Frank Meng United States
Mohamed Eisa relative to Colin White United States Colin White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Colin White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohamed Eisa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamed Eisa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamed Eisa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamed Eisa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamed Eisa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamed Eisa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamed Eisa. The network helps show where Mohamed Eisa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohamed Eisa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohamed Eisa Line = papers co-authored together Mohamed Eisa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018113
2 201417
3 201417
4 201416
5 201413
6 201413
7 201413
8
Artificial Neural Networks in Medical Images for Diagnosis Heart Valve Diseases
201312
9 202012
10 202410
11 19878
12 20158
13
Local Binary Patterns as Texture Descriptors for User Attitude Recognition
20108
14 20197
15 20147
16 20236
17 20206
18 20235
19 20195
20 20244

About Mohamed Eisa

Mohamed Eisa is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Information Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 47 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (7 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (6 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories (4 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (3 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (99 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (35 citations), Media Technology (21 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (50 citations) and Speech and Hearing (13 citations). Mohamed Eisa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Ganocy, Ronnie Fass, Takahisa Yamasaki, A. A. Salama, Florentín Smarandache, Ahmed A. Ewees, M. Z. Rashad, Endashaw Omer, Stephen A. McClave and Mohammed F. Alrahmawy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Current Gastroenterology Reports, Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility and Frontiers in Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact