Mohamed Eisa

33 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Mohamed Eisa
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Gastroenterology 103
  • Speech and Hearing 21
  • Management Science and Operations Research 31
  • Surgery 110
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 29
Replace Heidi Gregersen with:
Heidi Gregersen Denmark
Colin White United States
Abdul Raouf Khan Saudi Arabia
Michael D. Vasilakakis Greece
Manjeet Singh India
Jianwu Yang China
Ahmed Abdullah Alqarni Saudi Arabia
Ruikai Zhang China
Susan E. George United States
Huiqi Deng China
Mohamed Eisa relative to Heidi Gregersen Denmark Heidi Gregersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Heidi Gregersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohamed Eisa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamed Eisa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamed Eisa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamed Eisa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamed Eisa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamed Eisa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamed Eisa. The network helps show where Mohamed Eisa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohamed Eisa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohamed Eisa Line = papers co-authored together Mohamed Eisa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018105
2 201416
3 201413
4 201413
5
Artificial Neural Networks in Medical Images for Diagnosis Heart Valve Diseases
201312
6 202012
7 201412
8 201411
9 201410
10 20158
11 20247
12 20206
13 19876
14
Local Binary Patterns as Texture Descriptors for User Attitude Recognition
20106
15 20235
16 20234
17 20144
18 20213
19 20243
20 20133

About Mohamed Eisa

Mohamed Eisa is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Information Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 41 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (6 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (5 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories (3 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (3 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (3 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (103 citations), Speech and Hearing (21 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (31 citations), Surgery (110 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (29 citations). Mohamed Eisa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronnie Fass, Stephen J. Ganocy, Takahisa Yamasaki, A. A. Salama, Florentín Smarandache, M. Z. Rashad, Ahmed A. Ewees, Endashaw Omer, Ravi Prakash and Stephen A. McClave. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Current Gastroenterology Reports and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact