Mo Zhou

41 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Mo Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Health 45
  • General Decision Sciences 9
  • Economics and Econometrics 95
  • General Health Professions 41
  • Surgery 70
Replace Jennifer R. Elhawary with:
Jennifer R. Elhawary United States
István Májer United States
Jonathan Witonsky United States
Ridgely Fisk Green United States
Michael Wright Australia
Sören Höjgård Sweden
Sara Conti Italy
Anna G. C. Boef Netherlands
Tracy Beth Høeg United States
Christian R. Salazar United States
Mo Zhou relative to Jennifer R. Elhawary United States Jennifer R. Elhawary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jennifer R. Elhawary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mo Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mo Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Zhou. The network helps show where Mo Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mo Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mo Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Mo Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017106
2 201670
3 201442
4 202236
5 201535
6 201831
7 201623
8 201822
9 202119
10 202319
11 202218
12 202016
13 202115
14 201815
15 20188
16 20236
17 20236
18 20226
19 20226
20 20185

About Mo Zhou

Mo Zhou is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Health, General Health Professions and Surgery, having authored 49 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Peanut Plant Research Studies (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (45 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Economics and Econometrics (95 citations), General Health Professions (41 citations) and Surgery (70 citations). Mo Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John F. P. Bridges, Winter M. Thayer, F. Reed Johnson, Tim Xu, Susan Hutfless, Martin A. Makary, Kevin D. Frick, Douglas Mogul, Kathleen B. Schwarz and Yibo Li. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Scientific Reports, Plants, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact