M.J.J. Prick

17 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

M.J.J. Prick
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Clinical Biochemistry 141
  • Genetics 102
  • Neurology 98
  • Biochemistry 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 49
Replace J. Leonard with:
J. Leonard United Kingdom
Eilish Twomey Ireland
Leo Pažanin Croatia
Inderneel Sahai United States
Atsuko Harada Japan
Stephen H. Hite United States
Tejaswi Kandula Australia
M. Nathan Nair United States
Francesco Canonico Italy
Sunita Arya United States
M.J.J. Prick relative to J. Leonard United Kingdom J. Leonard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
J. Leonard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.J.J. Prick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.J.J. Prick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J.J. Prick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J.J. Prick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.J.J. Prick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J.J. Prick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J.J. Prick. The network helps show where M.J.J. Prick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.J.J. Prick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.J.J. Prick Line = papers co-authored together M.J.J. Prick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200187
2 198149
3 200044
4 200843
5 198343
6 199540
7 198140
8 199529
9 198126
10 200324
11
Improvement of central pontine myelinolysis as demonstrated by repeated magnetic resonance imaging in a patient without evidence of hyponatremia.
199920
12 199318
13 198218
14
Metastatic medulloblastoma in an adult; treatment with temozolomide.
200712
15
Six year survival after prolonged temozolomide treatment in a 30-year-old patient with glioblastoma.
20095
16 20094
17 19903

About M.J.J. Prick

M.J.J. Prick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (141 citations), Genetics (102 citations), Neurology (98 citations), Biochemistry (38 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations). M.J.J. Prick has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include W. I. M. Verhagen, Ronald Bartels, Richard W.M. van der Maazen, A. Keyser, H. H. J. Jaspar, H. J. J. A. Bernsen, Albert J. van der Kogel, Theo Veninga, E.H.J.M. Rutten and Ben J. Slotman. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Radiotherapy and Oncology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact