M.J. Coster

8 papers receiving 123 citations

Peers

M.J. Coster
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 11
  • Algebra and Number Theory 14
  • Artificial Intelligence 94
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 42
  • Geometry and Topology 16
Replace Woody Lichtenstein with:
Woody Lichtenstein United States
Stanislav Bulygin Germany
Zongduo Dai China
Chris Monico United States
Renate Scheidler Canada
Clément Pernet France
Reynald Lercier France
Heeralal Janwa Puerto Rico
David Kohel Australia
Yann Laigle-Chapuy France
M.J. Coster relative to Woody Lichtenstein United States Woody Lichtenstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Woody Lichtenstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.J. Coster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.J. Coster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J. Coster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J. Coster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.J. Coster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J. Coster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J. Coster. The network helps show where M.J. Coster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside M.J. Coster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.J. Coster Line = papers co-authored together M.J. Coster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 199297
2 19919
3
Addition chain heuristics
19898
4 19886
5 19865
6 19954
7
Some algorithms on addition chains and their complexity
19903
8
Quadratic forms in design theory
19942
9
Congruence properties of coefficients of certain algebraic power series
19881

About M.J. Coster

M.J. Coster is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Identities (3 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (2 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (2 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (2 papers), advanced mathematical theories (2 papers), Antenna Design and Optimization (1 paper), Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper) and Coding theory and cryptography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (11 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (14 citations), Artificial Intelligence (94 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (42 citations) and Geometry and Topology (16 citations). M.J. Coster has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brian LaMacchia, Antoine Joux, Claus-Peter Schnorr, Andrew Odlyzko, Jacques Stern, Willem H. Haemers and C. Roos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Designs Codes and Cryptography, Computational Complexity, Discrete Mathematics and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact