Mitchell P. Morton

636 citations
8 papers · 403 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell P. Morton

8 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Mitchell P. Morton
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 160
  • Biological Psychiatry 96
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 181
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 180
  • Social Psychology 108
Replace Jessica Ihne with:
Jessica Ihne United States
Emma S. Holt United States
Kelly M. Moench United States
Zachary S. Lorsch United States
Mollee R. Farrell United States
Shobha Anilkumar India
Anupratap Tomar Japan
Joyce Wang United States
Sophie Masneuf Switzerland
Romain Durand-de Cuttoli United States
Mitchell P. Morton relative to Jessica Ihne United States Jessica Ihne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Jessica Ihne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell P. Morton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell P. Morton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell P. Morton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell P. Morton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell P. Morton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell P. Morton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell P. Morton. The network helps show where Mitchell P. Morton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell P. Morton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell P. Morton Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell P. Morton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2017169
2 2018126
3 201994
4 20238
5 20243
6 20241
7 20231
8 20241

About Mitchell P. Morton

Mitchell P. Morton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (1 paper) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (160 citations), Biological Psychiatry (96 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (181 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). Mitchell P. Morton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Joshua A. Gordon, Alexander Z. Harris, Atheir I. Abbas, Scott S. Bolkan, Christoph Kellendonk, René Hen, Emma S. Holt, Piray Atsak, E. David Leonardo and Alan Jung Park. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, eLife, Cell Reports and Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact