Mitchell Naughton

423 citations
20 papers · 264 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Naughton

18 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Mitchell Naughton
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 168
  • Rehabilitation 55
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 44
  • Occupational Therapy 13
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Omar Heyward with:
Omar Heyward Australia
Bruno Pena Couto Brazil
Karol Gryko Poland
Teena Murray United States
Samuel Ryan Australia
Ritan Mehta United Kingdom
Dan Fransson Sweden
Christopher Kirk United Kingdom
John Brewer United Kingdom
Nikolaos Apostolidis Greece
Mitchell Naughton relative to Omar Heyward Australia Omar Heyward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Omar Heyward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Naughton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Naughton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Naughton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Naughton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Naughton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Naughton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Naughton. The network helps show where Mitchell Naughton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Naughton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Naughton Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Naughton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202238
2 202035
3 201735
4 201726
5 201925
6 202415
7 201615
8
Impact-Induced Muscle Damage: Performance Implications in Response to a Novel Collision Simulator and Associated Timeline of Recovery.
201815
9 202312
10 202311
11 20219
12 20247
13 20205
14 20235
15 20224
16 20234
17 20242
18 20241
19 20240
20 20240

About Mitchell Naughton

Mitchell Naughton is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (13 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (11 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (4 papers), Doping in Sports (3 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (168 citations), Rehabilitation (55 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (44 citations), Occupational Therapy (13 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Mitchell Naughton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Scott McLean, Paul M. Salmon, Gary Slater, Joanna Miller, Colin Solomon, Ben Jones, Sharief Hendricks, Adam D. Gorman, Cloe Cummins and Hugo A. Kerhervé. Their work appears in journals such as Sports Medicine - Open, Journal of Sports Sciences, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Sports and Active Living.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact