Sports Medicine - Open

765 papers and 12.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 765 papers published in Sports Medicine - Open in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Sports Medicine - Open usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (399 papers), Physiology (139 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (135 papers) specifically the topics of Sports injuries and prevention (278 papers), Sports Performance and Training (263 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sports Medicine - Open are Kyle R. Barnes, Andrew E. Kilding, Adamantios Arampatzis, Sebastian Böhm, Falk Mersmann, Darren Cosker, Murray Evans, Steffi Colyer, Aki Salo and Ben Jones.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sports Medicine - Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sports Medicine - Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sports Medicine - Open.

Countries where authors publish in Sports Medicine - Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sports Medicine - Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sports Medicine - Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sports Medicine - Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025