Mitchell M. Smith

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mitchell M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Clinical Psychology 686
  • Emergency Medical Services 178
  • Pollution 197
  • Health 122
  • General Health Professions 342
Replace Geetha Ranmuthugala with:
Geetha Ranmuthugala Australia
Jeremiah Mock United States
Pedro Arcos González Spain
William Dab France
George W. Thomson New Zealand
Akiko Kamimura United States
Chantelle A. M. Richmond Canada
Carlos Santos‐Burgoa United States
Theodore Herzl Tulchinsky Israel
Donald J Sharp United States
Mitchell M. Smith relative to Geetha Ranmuthugala Australia Geetha Ranmuthugala's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5.0×
Geetha Ranmuthugala · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell M. Smith. The network helps show where Mitchell M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021170
2 2013123
3 2004103
4 201485
5 201381
6 201073
7 200468
8 200268
9 201162
10 200455
11 201549
12 201747
13 201645
14 200540
15
The NSW Refugee Health Service - improving refugee access to primary care.
201239
16 201838
17 201731
18 201631
19 201628
20 200827

About Mitchell M. Smith

Mitchell M. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (37 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (6 papers), Global Health and Surgery (4 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (4 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (686 citations), Emergency Medical Services (178 citations), Pollution (197 citations), Health (122 citations) and General Health Professions (342 citations). Mitchell M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark H. Anshel, Mark Harris, Diana Milosevic, Shameran Slewa‐Younan, Godwin Adefikayo Ayoko, Llew Rintoul, Prasanna Egodawatta, Ashantha Goonetilleke, Beibei He and I‐Hao Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Environmental Science & Technology, International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Public Health Research & Practice and Journal of Analytical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact