Mitchell M. McCartney

939 citations
46 papers · 692 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell M. McCartney

45 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Mitchell M. McCartney
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Insect Science 125
  • Bioengineering 44
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 142
  • Biomedical Engineering 292
  • Sensory Systems 27
Replace M.M.L. Steeghs with:
M.M.L. Steeghs Netherlands
Simone Jürschik Austria
Anders Jönsson Sweden
Yvette Naudé South Africa
Ian M. Riddington United States
Maiken Ueland Australia
Brian A. Eckenrode United States
Matthew M. Booth United States
Allison M. Curran United States
Mitchell M. McCartney relative to M.M.L. Steeghs Netherlands M.M.L. Steeghs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
M.M.L. Steeghs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell M. McCartney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell M. McCartney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell M. McCartney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell M. McCartney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell M. McCartney. The network helps show where Mitchell M. McCartney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell M. McCartney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell M. McCartney Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell M. McCartney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017195
2 201454
3 201745
4 201433
5 201831
6 201927
7 201519
8 201919
9 202018
10 201916
11 202015
12 201914
13 202014
14 201714
15 201913
16 202213
17 202112
18 201812
19 202110
20 202110

About Mitchell M. McCartney

Mitchell M. McCartney is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Sensory Systems, Spectroscopy, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Bioengineering, having authored 46 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (32 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (125 citations), Bioengineering (44 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (142 citations), Biomedical Engineering (292 citations) and Sensory Systems (27 citations). Mitchell M. McCartney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Frequent co-authors include Cristina E. Davis, John Jacob Beck, Caitlin C. Rering, Rachel Lee Vannette, Nicholas J. Kenyon, Michael Schivo, Alexander A. Aksenov, A. Linderholm, Eva Borras and M. Yamaguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Breath Research, Analytical Chemistry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Phytopathology and ACS Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact