Mitchell M. McCartney

38 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Mitchell M. McCartney
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Insect Science 124
  • Bioengineering 44
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 130
  • Biomedical Engineering 274
  • Sensory Systems 30
Replace M.M.L. Steeghs with:
M.M.L. Steeghs Netherlands
Simone Jürschik Austria
R.M.C. Jansen Netherlands
Anna Filipiak Poland
Hsi-Hua Wang Taiwan
Ian M. Riddington United States
Anders Jönsson Sweden
Maiken Ueland Australia
Brian A. Eckenrode United States
Hans Gfeller Switzerland
Mitchell M. McCartney relative to M.M.L. Steeghs Netherlands M.M.L. Steeghs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
M.M.L. Steeghs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell M. McCartney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell M. McCartney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell M. McCartney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell M. McCartney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell M. McCartney. The network helps show where Mitchell M. McCartney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell M. McCartney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell M. McCartney Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell M. McCartney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017167
2 201452
3 201745
4 201828
5 201427
6 201925
7 202018
8 201517
9 201915
10 202014
11 201914
12 201714
13 201914
14 202113
15 202212
16 201912
17 202012
18 201811
19 202010
20 20188

About Mitchell M. McCartney

Mitchell M. McCartney is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Sensory Systems, having authored 45 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (30 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (5 papers), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (5 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (124 citations), Bioengineering (44 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (130 citations), Biomedical Engineering (274 citations) and Sensory Systems (30 citations). Mitchell M. McCartney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Frequent co-authors include Cristina E. Davis, Rachel L. Vannette, Caitlin C. Rering, John J. Beck, Nicholas J. Kenyon, Michael Schivo, Alexander A. Aksenov, A. Linderholm, M. Yamaguchi and Eva Borras. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Breath Research, Analytical Chemistry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Phytopathology and The Analyst.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact