Mitchell Henry Wright

27 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Mitchell Henry Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Food Science 143
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 64
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 36
  • Biochemistry 36
  • Horticulture 3
Replace Haiping Li with:
Haiping Li China
Mehboob Ahmed Pakistan
Gangatharan Muralitharan India
Sang Chul Lee South Korea
Pragati Kumari India
Abida Akram Pakistan
H. P. Gajera India
Ekaterina Krumova Bulgaria
Deepika Tripathi India
Mitchell Henry Wright relative to Haiping Li China Haiping Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Haiping Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Henry Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Henry Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Henry Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Henry Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Henry Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Henry Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Henry Wright. The network helps show where Mitchell Henry Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Henry Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Henry Wright Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Henry Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201780
2 201671
3 201842
4 201638
5 201825
6 201521
7 201619
8 201519
9 201617
10 201617
11 201716
12 201614
13 201713
14 201510
15 201610
16 20189
17 20199
18 20168
19 20167
20 20203

About Mitchell Henry Wright

Mitchell Henry Wright is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (16 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (7 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications (3 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (3 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (3 papers) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (143 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (64 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (36 citations), Biochemistry (36 citations) and Horticulture (3 citations). Mitchell Henry Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Carlson Greene, Ian Edwin Cock, Alan R. White, Ben Matthews, Joseph Sirdaarta, Bradley M. Tebo, Kati Geszvain, Véronique E. Oldham, George W. Luther and J. Brownlie. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, International Journal of Cosmetic Science, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Food Microbiology and Journal of Food Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact