Mitchell Edson

782 citations
38 papers · 691 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Edson

35 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Mitchell Edson
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Urology 79
  • Reproductive Medicine 69
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Surgery 239
  • Cancer Research 75
Replace Abdolrasoul Mehrsai with:
Abdolrasoul Mehrsai Iran
Daniel A. Nachtsheim United States
Chad W.M. Ritenour United States
Orhan Göğüş Türkiye
Thomas J. Rohner United States
R. Tauber Germany
Erfan Amini Iran
Seung Hyun Jeon South Korea
Marco Oderda Italy
Yakup Kordan Türkiye
Mitchell Edson relative to Abdolrasoul Mehrsai Iran Abdolrasoul Mehrsai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Abdolrasoul Mehrsai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Edson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Edson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Edson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Edson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Edson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Edson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Edson. The network helps show where Mitchell Edson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Edson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Edson Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Edson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985143
2 197689
3 198767
4 199760
5 197144
6 197533
7 197729
8 197926
9 198221
10 199020
11 198418
12 198317
13 198914
14 199211
15 197510
16 19829
17 19767
18 19897
19 19776
20 19836

About Mitchell Edson

Mitchell Edson is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Urology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (4 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (79 citations), Reproductive Medicine (69 citations), Biochemistry (45 citations), Surgery (239 citations) and Cancer Research (75 citations). Mitchell Edson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John P. Enterline, Marvin A. Jackson, Joseph Kovi, Aaron G. Jackson, Lalita Kaul, Sophie Perry, G. W. Jones, Martin Y. Heshmat, S. Grant Mulholland and Thomas A. Waldmann. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Fertility and Sterility, Contraception and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact