Min–Ho Oak

2.8k citations
76 papers · 2.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Min–Ho Oak

74 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Min–Ho Oak
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Biochemistry 524
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 171
  • Pharmacology 179
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 51
  • Biochemistry 106
Replace Catalina Carrasco‐Pozo with:
Catalina Carrasco‐Pozo Chile
Ping‐Hsiao Shih Taiwan
Constance Lay Lay Saw United States
Sungwook Chae South Korea
Hyong Joo Lee South Korea
Ming‐Jiuan Wu Taiwan
Vladimir A. Kostyuk Belarus
Adluri Ram Sudheer India
Lurdes Mira Portugal
Junkyu Han Japan
Min–Ho Oak relative to Catalina Carrasco‐Pozo Chile Catalina Carrasco‐Pozo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Catalina Carrasco‐Pozo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min–Ho Oak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min–Ho Oak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min–Ho Oak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min–Ho Oak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min–Ho Oak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min–Ho Oak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min–Ho Oak. The network helps show where Min–Ho Oak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min–Ho Oak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min–Ho Oak Line = papers co-authored together Min–Ho Oak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004476
2 2000182
3 2006155
4 1998122
5 2018102
6 201595
7 202274
8 200568
9 201267
10 200460
11 201757
12 201251
13 201147
14 201744
15 201641
16 200839
17 201937
18 199937
19 202335
20 201226

About Min–Ho Oak

Min–Ho Oak is a scholar working on Immunology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biochemistry, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (7 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (6 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (524 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (171 citations), Pharmacology (179 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations) and Biochemistry (106 citations). Min–Ho Oak has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Valérie B. Schini‐Kerth, Thierry Chataigneau, Jean‐Claude Stoclet, Marta Chataigneau, Mamadou Ndiaye, Kyeong-Man Kim, Gyurng‐Soo Yoo, Sin‐Hee Park, Kyeong‐Man Kim and Valérie B. Schini-Kerth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Planta Medica, Cardiovascular Research, Atherosclerosis and Archives of Pharmacal Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact