Ming-Jer Huang

498 citations
17 papers · 418 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Jer Huang

16 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Ming-Jer Huang
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Gastroenterology 61
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 162
  • Hematology 53
  • Oncology 100
  • Biochemistry 21
Replace Diana Corao with:
Diana Corao United States
Georgios D. Ayiomamitis Greece
Marta Soares Portugal
Iain M. Paterson United Kingdom
Jung Shin Lee South Korea
Dimitrios Kapetanos Greece
Toshiro Yoshiyuki Japan
Yasumichi Yagi Japan
Sun Mi Lee South Korea
Toshitaka Fukumoto Japan
Ming-Jer Huang relative to Diana Corao United States Diana Corao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Diana Corao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Jer Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Jer Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Jer Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Jer Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Jer Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Jer Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Jer Huang. The network helps show where Ming-Jer Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Jer Huang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Jer Huang Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Jer Huang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2005109
2 200748
3 200743
4 199630
5 200228
6 200427
7 200426
8 200025
9 200719
10 200516
11 200615
12 200611
13 200210
14 20007
15
The role of red blood cell distribution width in the differential diagnosis of microcytic anemia.
19882
16 20062
17 20030

About Ming-Jer Huang

Ming-Jer Huang is a scholar working on Hematology, Gastroenterology, Neurology, Ophthalmology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (5 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (61 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (162 citations), Hematology (53 citations), Oncology (100 citations) and Biochemistry (21 citations). Ming-Jer Huang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and India. Frequent co-authors include Ken‐Hong Lim, Ruey-Kuen Hsieh, Chin‐Yuan Tzen, Hsu-Tah Kuo, Ian Yi‐Feng Chang, Jyh‐Ming Chow, H. Eugene Liu, Johnson Lin, Wen‐Yen Lin and Li-Tzong Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Oncology, Urology, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, CHEST Journal and Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact