Countries where authors publish in Medical Oncology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Oncology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Oncology.
About Medical Oncology
The 5.2k papers published in Medical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 92.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Medical Oncology usually cover Oncology (2.0k papers), Cancer Research (1.0k papers), Hematology (425 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (629 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of MicroRNA in disease regulation (270 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (266 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (262 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (255 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (254 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (204 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (196 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Oncology are Ezzeldin M. Ibrahim, Tadashi Terada, Oliver Thews, Peter Vaupel, Michael Hoeckel, Keywan Mortezaee, Jamal Majidpoor, Rainer J. Klement, Sandro Barni and Fausto Petrelli.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.