Countries where authors publish in Medical Oncology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Oncology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Oncology.
About Medical Oncology
The 5.4k papers published in Medical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 99.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Medical Oncology usually cover Oncology (1.2k papers), Cancer Research (652 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (921 papers), Genetics (235 papers) and Hematology (358 papers) specifically the topics of Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (220 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (188 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (166 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (165 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (157 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (154 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (150 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Oncology are Ezzeldin M. Ibrahim, Tadashi Terada, Peter W. Vaupel, Michael Hoeckel, Oliver Thews, Rainer J. Klement, Keywan Mortezaee, Sandro Barni, Fausto Petrelli and Jamal Majidpoor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.