Ming Yan

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ming Yan
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Physiology 91
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 202
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 74
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 238
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 157
Replace Chao Deng with:
Chao Deng China
Uwe Primeßnig Germany
Shaolong Yang United States
Miaomiao Fan China
Lakshmi Pulakat United States
Di Ye China
Ying Yu China
Yingzi Zhao China
Shigehiro Hayashi Japan
Ming Yan relative to Chao Deng China Chao Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Chao Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Yan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Yan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Yan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Yan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Yan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Yan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Yan. The network helps show where Ming Yan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Yan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Yan Line = papers co-authored together Ming Yan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997147
2 2008137
3 2012101
4 200975
5 199971
6 199869
7 201066
8 201064
9 201859
10 201056
11 201851
12 201845
13 201144
14 201442
15 199829
16 201028
17 202326
18 201621
19 200920
20 201718

About Ming Yan

Ming Yan is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Biomaterials, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sodium Intake and Health (3 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers) and Bone Metabolism and Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (91 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (202 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (74 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (238 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (157 citations). Ming Yan has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Shmuel Muallem, Min Goo Lee, Ramille N. Shah, Phillip L. Lewis, Xiaoxiang Zheng, Kedi Xu, Steven D. Crowley, Robert Griffiths, Phillip Ruiz and James L. Burchette. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin and Ceramics International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact