Ming Cui

5.3k citations
126 papers · 4.0k · h-index 36

Impact in

  • Health top 0.5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma

Papers in

Ming Cui

122 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Ming Cui
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Health 603
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • Demography 809
  • Soil Science 321
Replace Thomas Ledermann with:
Thomas Ledermann United States
Robert L. Burgess United States
John P. Hoffmann United States
Gary W. Peterson United States
Sarah O. Meadows United States
Joy D. Osofsky United States
Lia C. H. Fernald United States
Laura Camfield United Kingdom
Jean Gérard France
Craig Hadley United States
Ming Cui relative to Thomas Ledermann United States Thomas Ledermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Thomas Ledermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Cui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Cui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Cui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Cui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Cui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Cui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Cui. The network helps show where Ming Cui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Cui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Cui Line = papers co-authored together Ming Cui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000360
2 2010199
3 2013165
4 2008155
5 2007143
6 2008122
7 2010117
8 200890
9 200088
10 201087
11 200886
12 201171
13 200271
14 201271
15 201970
16 201968
17 201264
18 201964
19 200861
20 201058

About Ming Cui

Ming Cui is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Education, having authored 126 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (50 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (26 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (11 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (603 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations), Demography (809 citations) and Soil Science (321 citations). Ming Cui has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Frank D. Fincham, Rand D. Conger, Chalandra M. Bryant, Glen H. Elder, Mellissa S. Gordon, M. Brent Donnellan, Mathew D. Gayman, Jinxing Zhou, Lenore M. McWey and Frederick O. Lorenz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Family Studies, Family Relations, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Forests and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact