Ming Cui

5.3k citations
121 papers · 3.8k · h-index 36

Impact in

  • Health top 0.5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma

Papers in

Ming Cui

117 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Ming Cui
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Health 570
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • Demography 763
  • Soil Science 317
Replace Thomas Ledermann with:
Thomas Ledermann United States
John P. Hoffmann United States
Robert L. Burgess United States
Joy D. Osofsky United States
Gary W. Peterson United States
Lia C. H. Fernald United States
Sarah O. Meadows United States
Jean Gérard France
Krzysztof Kaniasty United States
Craig Hadley United States
Ming Cui relative to Thomas Ledermann United States Thomas Ledermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Thomas Ledermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Cui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Cui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Cui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Cui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Cui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Cui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Cui. The network helps show where Ming Cui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Cui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Cui Line = papers co-authored together Ming Cui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000341
2 2010183
3 2013155
4 2008148
5 2007138
6 2008118
7 2010111
8 200888
9 200886
10 200086
11 201081
12 201970
13 201169
14 200267
15 201266
16 201965
17 201964
18 201260
19 200859
20 201057

About Ming Cui

Ming Cui is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 121 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (49 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (36 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (23 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (13 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (570 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations), Demography (763 citations) and Soil Science (317 citations). Ming Cui has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Rand D. Conger, Frank D. Fincham, Chalandra M. Bryant, Glen H. Elder, Mellissa S. Gordon, M. Brent Donnellan, Mathew D. Gayman, Jinxing Zhou, Lenore M. McWey and Frederick O. Lorenz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Family Studies, Family Relations, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Forests and Personal Relationships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact