Min‐Chi Ku

1.1k citations
35 papers · 830 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
    • Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Genetics top 5%
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Papers in

Min‐Chi Ku

32 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers

Min‐Chi Ku
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Neurology 254
  • Genetics 169
  • Immunology 252
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
Replace Csilla Fazakas with:
Csilla Fazakas Hungary
Diana Matias Brazil
Ricardo Gargini Spain
Ethan Poteet United States
Rackele Ferreira do Amaral Brazil
Qingsong Wang China
Chan Hyun Na United States
Sara Oliván Spain
Nadine Henke Germany
Bartłomiej Gielniewski Poland
Min‐Chi Ku relative to Csilla Fazakas Hungary Csilla Fazakas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Csilla Fazakas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min‐Chi Ku

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min‐Chi Ku's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min‐Chi Ku with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min‐Chi Ku more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min‐Chi Ku

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min‐Chi Ku. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min‐Chi Ku. The network helps show where Min‐Chi Ku may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min‐Chi Ku, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min‐Chi Ku Line = papers co-authored together Min‐Chi Ku links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006188
2 2013117
3 201496
4 201395
5 201751
6 201336
7 202034
8 201533
9 201822
10 201520
11 200519
12 202017
13 201515
14 201414
15 200511
16 201310
17 20178
18 20167
19 20187
20 20215

About Min‐Chi Ku

Min‐Chi Ku is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology, Immunology and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (15 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (8 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (5 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers) and Immune cells in cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (254 citations), Genetics (169 citations), Immunology (252 citations), Biological Psychiatry (26 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations). Min‐Chi Ku has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Thoralf Niendorf, Jia‐Yi Wang, Ya‐Ni Huang, Andreas Pohlmann, Helmut Kettenmann, Michael Synowitz, Susanne A. Wolf, Sonia Waiczies, Helmar Waiczies and Seija Lehnardt. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Neuro-Oncology, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and British Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact